It is undeniable that employees are the key assets for any company. Many experts believe that top level officials should involve the employees in making decisions while others hold opponent’s view. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints and come to a plausible solution.
One of the strongest reason why many people agree that top management should engage low-key staff in decision making, is that employees have the better insights about the business, and they know – how of the firm. For instance, an employee can not only provide practical solutions to a given problem but also add innovative feedback, which in turn could enhance the quality of the product. In addition, companies can save time, money and resources by including employees in decision making process rather than outsourcing it to a third party. Therefore, companies’ top management should certainly involve employees in the discussions relating to major decisions.
On the contrary, decisions pertaining to sensitive information must not be discussed with employees, as many past incidents suggest that employees can leak the confidential information to the auditors and outsiders for their own gains, which is sometimes termed as ‘Insider Trading’. Moreover, financial losses incurred by the organization should not be shared with the staff as it could create panic among them and could give rise to rumors.
In conclusion, as given by the preceding discussion, it is obvious that employees’ feedback and valuable inputs which are carefully inspected and incorporated in the decision making process by top level management can certainly benefit the company as well as the employees. To survive in this competitive world, Companies would continue finding innovative ways to take smart decisions and stay ahead in the race.
- Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss. 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, therefore, third, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52482269504 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01889494248 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2088705918 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426576971759 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149018220957 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106420393827 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24998993242 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597962482657 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.