Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the impact of social media on individuals and general public. Many people argue that such sites have negatively influenced society and I firmly concur with this opinion. I will further discuss my opinion in the following paragraphs.

The first noteworthy point is that social media provides platform to remotely interacting with our friends and families, hence alleviates the real world interactions, It could subsequently lead to broader psychological issues. For example, youth and teenagers get enclosed in a room for messaging their friends which promotes antisocial behavior.

Further, most people waste their precious time by engaging in exploring non-constructive social media sites such as Facebook. For instance, on an average, a person spends two hours daily on Facebook and other social media apps such as WhatsApp, Instagram which could otherwise be spent on other important activities such as exercises, reading, cooking etc. This sedentary lifestyle ultimately attacks the health and individual suffer from diseases such as High Blood pressure and diabetes.

To recapitulate, social media does more harm than good. It’s important to wisely choose between our health and social media. The middle path is to limit the use of social media sites and pay attention to our hobbies and overall well being.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...pact of social media on individuals and general public. Many people argue that such sites have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57075471698 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80749946069 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693396226415 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0409314259 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128307584781 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516886490829 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048533510276 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804611421089 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562305856986 0.0609392437508 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.