In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To extent do ypu agree or dis agree? Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of the shopping mall and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the huge shopping centres is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the large city can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, small local bazaar can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of shopping online, as well as internet shopping, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered window shopping. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both popular brands and price of goods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the city's shopping mall might increase the consequences of the city centre. Moreover, fundamental aspects of city population could relate to this reality that demerits of industrial cities pertain to developing cities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the capital city is correlated negatively with the city life. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the small town.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing shopping centres far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of buying easily prove the significance of the necessary commodity, but also pinpoint comfortable shopping implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48076923077 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08367288498 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8935212668 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178132618689 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590820831229 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432784201651 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971371717072 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258955905341 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.