Large shopping arcades are becoming popular these days and replacing small local shops. Some people believe that it is positive while others think it is negative. This essay will discuss why many shopping plazas are replacing small retail shops in towns and cities with examples.
There is a myriad of reasons to support these shopping malls. The most preponderant one is the shopping plazas provide car parking facility to customers. In addition, this parking facility is free in some malls, and it also provides security to the vehicles. As an example, surveys conducted by the University of Mexico in 2018 show that parking facility is positively correlated with consumers' behavior to select shopping mall. The above study also suggests that bigger the parking area more the customer's interest.
Another pivotal argument is that customers feel comfortable when they get choices for product selection. They do not have to move to different places in small shops to find a variety of products. For instance, research conducted by eminent scientists shows that there is a strong relation between product varieties and consumer interest. The above longitudinal study also shows present empirical evidence of the likelihood of several customers is directly related. Hence, comfort attracts more customers.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of large shopping malls are indeed too great to ignore.
- Tourism has caused environmental problems in many parts of the world. What sort of problems has been caused and what can be done about them? 61
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree? 77
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 77
- Tourism has caused environmental problems in many parts of the world. What sort of problems has been caused and what can be done about them? 11
- Is that law can change the human behaviour? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92890995261 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17539789177 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658767772512 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.5024630542 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 164.356928664 50.4703680194 326% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 250.2 104.977214359 238% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.2 20.9669160288 201% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267568341087 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133844252762 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109490647789 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163650217296 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987735874654 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.6 12.6369458128 218% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.93 53.1260098522 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.9458128079 201% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 18.0 11.5310837438 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 9.94827586207 317% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.3980295567 181% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.