In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s word is a colossal upsurge is a large number of people can take benefits from large shopping malls and save their time while doing shopping. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life but I do entirely accept this concept and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that small shopping shops will convert into large shopping malls which can provide ease in people daily life. They can easily buy mostly things from one place and also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to a wide range of advantages being offered by changing small shops into large shopping malls, which provide more than one benefits when it comes to being effective and they can also enhance the productivity and standard of their life with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merit stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of a better life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can one broaden their horizons, learning such essential attributes as responsibilities, dedication and perseverance. Hence it is apparent why many are in favour of small local shops should replace into large shopping malls.
In view of this arguments outlined above, one can conclude that, the benefits of converting small shops into large shopping malls in town and cites are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...f today’s word is a colossal upsurge is a large number of people can take benefits from large sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ibilities, dedication and perseverance. Hence it is apparent why many are in favour o...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...into large shopping malls. In view of this arguments outlined above, one can concl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8701754386 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58233695377 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0021373217 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.181818182 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224742318955 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101566291993 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11850125515 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166805858222 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586362949299 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.