The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year's. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such objects.
Recently, different types of universities course have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably lead to a moot question "should university courses be more practical than theoretical?". Whereas it is a widely held view that theoretical sources are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, universities courses are bound up inextricably with standard syllabus, which indicates they lead to both practical and theoretical bases. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between future job opportunity and skills as well as an exponential increase in performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of assessment is correlated positively with not only written assignment but also oral examination.
Within the realm of society perspective, without the slightest doubt, intelligent students attribute to high grade, in that it would come down to laboratory, team working, and mental ability. A salient example of such attribution is doing experiment, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take not profit task for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint finding appropriate career problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to academic study, annual salary, and even unskilled graduated students. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of practical and work skills in future professional life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of practical courses are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the education standpoint, universit...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignment but also oral examination. Within the realm of society perspective,...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kills in future professional life. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93470790378 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27869990286 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687285223368 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0353090993 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.846153846 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00722435423383 0.242375264174 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00231500640269 0.0925447433944 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00801941741862 0.071462118173 11% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00353211982302 0.151781067708 2% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00611781099189 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.