AS travel can only benefits the richest people in the world ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

AS travel can only benefits the richest people in the world ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. Do you agree or disagree

The importance of travel can only benefits the richest people in the world ordinary people can get no advantage with development of air travel. Which was always debatable has now becomes more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent year my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that some time very peoples to need airplane because some time needs a people very urgent work. When rich people booking the plane another pivotal aspect of this argument is that some poor people when urgent work not booking the airplane ticket .needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.

However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that people need to airplane in any urgent works besides but some people not should this work hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.

According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of travel can only advantage are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-30 Ramanpreetsingh 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vantage with development of air travel. Which was always debatable has now becomes mo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e time needs a people very urgent work. When rich people booking the plane another...
^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work. When rich people booking the plane another pivotal aspect of this argument ...
^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ent work not booking the airplane ticket .needless to say all these merits stand i...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l these merits stand in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...only advantage are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless its potential drawbacks should not be o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1062992126 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55345541184 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9594365359 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.111111111 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29768956716 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155343081424 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.250431233414 0.071462118173 350% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185276088543 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111224834014 0.0609392437508 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.