In the last ten years, tourism industries in developing countries had escalated enormously. As they became one of the most conspicuous trends of today's world, the countries experience the improvements as well as consequences. This essay will discuss the merit and demerit of this trend and the reason why the former outdo the latter.
There is no denying that tourists play significant roles to improve country's economic. Not only they generate income for the local businesses, they also help to promote the country's popularity, which also contributed greatly on economic perspective. For example, recently the economic of Maldives surged significantly because delighted tourists who had visited there kept promoting its merits. In shorts, tourists are accountable for the exposure and the economic well-being of the country they visited.
Along with the benefits, there are also consequences associated with it in regards of the human resources and knowledge. Not every tourists bring a positive impact and it is difficult for a country that has limited experience on coping bad influences brought to the country without the help of other more developed countries. For example, Maldives might not have enough resources to tackle the illegal drug brought by the incoming people, as the result, citizens will get the negative impacts. In sums, tourists can bring negative impact to the countries, however, it is highly possible to manage the situation.
This essay has argued the advantages and disadvantages of tourism's vast development in third-world countries. In view of the arguments outlined, I can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of tourism industry in a less developed country are too great to ignore and all the benefits stand the citizens of involved countries in good stead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...re also consequences associated with it in regards of the human resources and knowledge. Not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, well, for example, in short, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37113402062 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8720300045 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2173739413 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116905199723 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429376839568 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494058048185 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724451967338 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473427810974 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.