There is no denying that the appearance of internet has changed the way of traditional teaching method and some people even think that it has entirely revolted the role of teacher. This essay will discuss how the internet revolution has indeed shifted teacher's role to some extent, but not entirely replaced it.
Internet provides myriad of study materials from every fields and people has been learning practically everything through self-learning. In addition, most of the content are also come in affordable price if not free. For example, students can learn programming foundation and gain access to practice materials from free online learning. In sums, what internet can offer in educational aspects is abundance and it serves a positive influence as far as educational is in concern.
However, there is a limit in how much students can learn with the absence of teachers. Although teachers come with tuition fees, their services are typically worth it in terms of motivation and goals. For example, once students hit a certain level of expertise in programming, they need feedback and consultation on which path they should aim next. In short, teachers provide direction and pathway to the skills which students cannot determine by themselves.
This essay has discussed how much the escalation in internet usage helps people gain knowledge by self-learning also the importance of teacher's existence to support the learning. Therefore, I am consummately in accord to the opinion that internet vast development revolutionise the way of teaching, however teachers' roles are still utmost paramount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
...t free. For example, students can learn programming foundation and gain access to practice ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rn. However, there is a limit in how much students can learn with the absence of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88328811258 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615079365079 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8279882074 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18792810517 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639018449672 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062782421413 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115806339249 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756745470589 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.