In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that tourism has more pros than cons. There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. Most preponderant one is that tourism not only contributes to increase economy of any country but also lead to numerous benefits in various fields. Thanks to a wide range of advantages it offers, but not only one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of tourism. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussion when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on the economy of the country is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are in against tourism.
In the views of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks that benefit of tourism is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...is will lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88065843621 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70146351625 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.644500087 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0775513244018 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297787047591 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331383431864 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504369250751 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188580560768 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.