Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.
At university, students are commonly assessed through individual or group assignments. These assignments always are time limited and mark deduction is applied when students fail to meet the deadlines. This essay will argue that while such punishment is strict and imposes pressure on students, it is mandatory to do so.
To commence with, due date requires students to manage their time effectively and avoid procrastination. Penalty is an effective way to gain students commitment on completing the tasks within the time frame. For instance, students usually work on multiple projects or assignments at the same time without any given schedule. To avoid losing marks, the students are more likely to plan their schedule and assign a reasonable amount of time for the task. Therefore, marks should be subtracted from students who fail to meet the deadlines.
Secondly, opponents might argue that tasks are occasionally too challenging for students, and consequently, penalty due to late submission is not necessary. In fact, most universities provide assistance to students in completing their assignments. To clarify, students are free to discuss with each other or their professors. There are also other services to help with other aspects of the assignment such as writing essay, statistical analysis or software demonstration. Thus, by imposing penalties, students are encouraged to employ all study aids and do their best to complete the given assignments.
To conclude, this essay has argued that students should receive penalty when they fail to submit their assignment on time. Such punishment ensures students commitment on sufficiently using all available resources offered by university to carry out the given task efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...or group assignments. These assignments always are time limited and mark deduction is appl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: There are other; There are also
...ss with each other or their professors. There are also other services to help with other aspects of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53183520599 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01230252973 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.951246778 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17198288006 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632629807829 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471983033457 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106719082771 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142910655219 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.