Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this

Essay topics:

Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this

In most organizations, employees are encouraged to give opinions and contribution in decision making process of company’s products and services. This essay will examine the benefits and drawbacks of this management strategy.
Engaging employees in the decision making process creates an open organizational structure. The structure allows for a free flow of information and utilization of the staffs’ experience. It is evident that employees are those who directly deal with customers and other stakeholders. Together with their previous experience on similar role in other companies, they are more likely to come up with an instant and practical solution to any arisen problem. An open organizational structure encourages employees to contribute their opinions and improve the overall performance of the organizations.
However, this management strategy may be impractical for large-sized organizations. In order to make the strategy works, top – level managers need to constantly update and be very open for discussion. A simple organizational structure and effective communication method are also necessary so that the voice of employees can be heard and applied effectively. These are great challenges to large scale organizations. In fact, these companies always establish certain procedures and administrative processes to maintain their own standard quality. As a result, when employees’ idea reaches the managers and final decision is made, it is no longer an effective solution.
To conclude, although a well-organized structure is required to effectively engage employees in the decision making process, getting employees involved in such process helps to improve to the final products and services.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, well, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87301587302 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41196005302 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59126984127 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4450706062 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258335202331 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864240982644 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819058389378 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186016358762 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693240470006 0.0609392437508 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 10.9458128079 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.