Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.

Essay topics:

Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.

At university, students are commonly assessed through individual or group assignments. These assignments are always time limited and marks are deducted when students fail to meet the deadlines. This essay will argue that while such punishment is strict and imposes pressure on students, it is mandatory to do so.
To begin with, due date requires students to manage their time effectively and avoid procrastination. Penalty is an effective way to gain students commitment on completing the tasks within the time frame. For instance, while working on multiple projects at the same time, students are self – control on their timetable. To avoid losing marks, they are more likely to plan their schedule and assign a reasonable amount of time for the task. By meeting the deadlines, students demonstrate their commitment in completing tasks and good time management strategy.
Secondly, opponents might argue that some tasks are challenging for some students, and consequently, penalty due to late submission is not necessary. However, it is unfair for those who work hard to finish the tasks on time if late submission is not punished. In fact, most universities provide assistance to students in completing their assignments. To clarify, students are free to discuss with each other or their professors. There are other services to help with other aspects of the assignment such as writing essay, statistical analysis or software demonstration. Thus, there is no reason why some students cannot complete the given task on time while others can.
To conclude, this essay has argued that students should receive penalties when they fail to submit their assignment on time. Such punishment ensures students commitment on sufficiently using all available resources offered by university to carry out the given task efficiently.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-04 Rafia Jawad 77 view
2024-05-14 Rafia Jawad 55 view
2023-01-21 woutan 93 view
2023-01-11 Yuli 80 view
2022-04-14 ots1 77 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3986013986 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91650313097 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.6787179245 50.4703680194 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147297377407 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556684015339 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415965520251 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969026960873 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241996860238 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.