Whether experiential learning (learning by doing0 can work well in formal education, agree or disagree OR experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? agree or disagree
Extensive research has been carried out to improve students learning outcomes. While some people prefer the traditional method of using textbooks in teaching, there are more and more people believe that experiential learning will be the future trend in near future. This essay will discuss why education should adopt experiential learning to improve students’ performance.
The impact of the experiential learning remains a controversy topic. Such learning technique helps students’ learn the foundation knowledge and develop other soft skills to solve problems. For instance, while involving in a group project, students enhance their ability to work as a team and communication skills. Furthermore, such project requires students to gather information, analyse the information and derive a critical solution to the problem. Such skills and abilities cannot be developed by just reading textbooks and going to lectures. Therefore, practical learning assessments should be added in the course syllabus.
It is human nature that we remember things longer through practical experience. It is highly recommended that education institutions should adopt the experiential learning technique to improve students’ performance. A common mind trick to memorise multiple items is creating a story to link all objects into the story. In a similar way, practical experience gives students a context in which knowledge consists of a series of relating information; and therefore, such learning technique enhance students’ long term memory.
To conclude, this essay argues that learning through practical experience can benefit students in several ways such as building their soft skills and improve their memory. In my opinion, learning through experience is a potential teaching technique in formal education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 76 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 45 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | ameliale92 | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-02 | belinapupa | 93 | view |
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 77
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.Or Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 77
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this 80
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ory to link all objects into the story. In a similar way, practical experience gives students a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87169811321 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08982643718 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5807836297 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197604574871 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746577593074 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615886486015 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135988128331 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455266526136 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.