In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Nowadays, ecpressing your idea freely has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether in a war of idea, it is reasonable to kill people or not?”. It is a widely held view that having free statement in the society is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must wegh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the right of citing your idea without killing by the government plays a vital role in the society. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this subject. First and foremost is that in the majority of nations people are not allow express their idea, and subsequently arrested for political crimes or are tortured severly. Secondly, it can be argued that some countries try to limit the rights of people and impose tougher requlations while citizens are reluctant to follw their politics and in some cases they are obtained death penalties. In addition to this information, a very tanjible example to illustrate would be North Korea that individuals deprive using theInternet and cannot to intract other countries.
However, there is no doubt that killing people for stating ideas provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that advocates think that some group’s ideology mislead the communities andleads to damaging consequenses.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the free statement of each nation must be taken into consideration and they should be free to attend in ideologic groups. However, as every gardem may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- Polygamy has led to massive divorce rates around the globe. Give the possible option for this issue and various solutions to reduce the rate. 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 78
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views. 77
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... ecpressing your idea freely has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es or are tortured severly. Secondly, it can be argued that some countries try to...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bt that killing people for stating ideas provides people with various positive po...
^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e that the free statement of each nation must be taken into consideration and the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1660899654 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87333523337 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2034321318 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1919623951 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678735032261 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631865764106 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111519072512 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588007171274 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.