What are Advantages of mobiles?
The importance of mobiles which was always contentious has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is highly beneficial why others reject this notion. The substantial influence of waste of money has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate positive effect of this above trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most predominant one's stems from the fact that mobiles phones play a vital role in human's life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that mobiles phones have become a crucial role in the contemporary era. As a well-known example, the proportion of mobile usage has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent. As a result, it is fruit for the 21st century.
Moreover, this trend has some more merits but one of the most significant effects that accompany the assistance of mobiles anyone can access knowledge easily. Furthermore, mobiles phones are augmenting relationship around the globe. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of mobiles phones. Last but not least, anyone can learn from mobiles with the help of the internet such as you tube.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of using mobile phones are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07755102041 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67329801601 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.180507327 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159641268572 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626347550688 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449987472284 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102723013129 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508995412055 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.