What is your opinion on deducting marks on student’s work if it is late?
Recently, the phenomenon og punishing pupils by deducting their scores because of lating and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this way of punishment is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial numbers of individuals, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be a minus and tutors should try other ways.
From a social standpoint, there are several disadvantages of giving low marks to pupils bacause of arriving late at classrooms. These demerits are rooted in the fact of disencouragement. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the drawbacks of this topic. The educational policy in developed countries is performing motivating schemes in order to psych up the yoths to attend in curriculum programs including seminars, lectures and classrooms. Furthermore, an array of faculties highly believe that the issue of presence and absence of the students is related to them not schools and educational systems should provide knowledgeable, interesting and helpful conditions in their classrooms. These factors should create the motivation among pupils to be in their classrooms on-time and create this belief in their minds that if they do not attend in them, they will miss something useful.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of decreasing the scores after every late has some adherents. They argued that some juveniles do not consider their courses and colleges should have some punishment schemes like giving them the low marks. According to research undertaken by a prestigious university this type of punishment is common in loads of countries particularly the developing ones.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that diminishing the pupils' marks because of being late is not an appropriate solution.
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25 year old is necessary? 77
- We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions? 11
- Is travel a necessary component of education or not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge or not? 88
- In a social events, Being a good talker or a good listener which one is better 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37123745819 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07771183725 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.12754945 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914090883899 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316418684204 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383420485733 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576277514001 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233298926545 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.