People argue whether it is hard work or luck that contributes to success. What is your opinion?
To begin with, hard work is closely linked with many elements such as continuous learning, proper planning, dedication, time management, and mainly consistency. Success is always associated with these qualities and not merely with luck. For example, Edison's great invention of the light bulb came through hard work, setbacks, failures, and consistent effort throughout his discovery. He proudly said that he had learned ten thousand different ways of doing it after his final successful attempt following several failed attempts.
On the other hand, luck only plays a small role in any journey towards success. We have heard of very few achievers who attribute their success solely to luck. Luck will not help one gain knowledge, build character, or acquire experience as hard work does through the journey towards success. We are paid by our employers for our work, not for our luck. Anything that comes without hard work will not be sustained for long. The journey towards success through luck will not build character and consistency as hard work does.
To conclude, hard work is the main factor that contributes to success. Hence, consistent effort truly plays a key role in a person's success, with little or no luck involved.
- People argue whether it is hard work or luck that contributes to success What is your opinion 62
- Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles skates the subway etc 88
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 79
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. 77
- Some people believe that confidence wins bigger games that knowledge alone cannot. Also, that accumulating knowledge makes no sense until one has the confidence to put it to use.Is it true that knowledge will help one win a struggle only if it is put into 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tent effort truly plays a key role in a persons success, with little or no luck involve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, for example, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.185 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56007324114 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 379.143842365 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8044827731 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283318259201 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120149901252 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070718435159 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203208215581 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513525789106 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.