When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc

Recently, the phenomenon of this opinion that computer made us smarter and happier and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the computer in term of productivity is highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I m inclined to this belief that the opposite view is not true, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support computer productivity in providing goods and services. At first, one disadvantage with the computer is made us less physical motion and exercise. However, the rate of works has become faster than before by computer. the rate of mathematical calculations by computer is higher than the human's mind. For example, in many mathematical operations such as banking and financial operations have become easier and faster than before.
In addition, the capacity of computer's memory is lower than of human's mind. But, the computer memory works more accurate. human errors have no any place in computer operations. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2012 has shown that a significant number of errors related to careless of human such as false in minus and plus have removed after the advent of the computer.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments about the impacts of the computer on our living. I profoundly believe that the benefits of the computer are far outweighed its drawbacks in the human's life.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... become faster than before by computer. the rate of mathematical calculations by co...
^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
...he computer memory works more accurate. human errors have no any place in computer op...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... works more accurate. human errors have no any place in computer operations. For i...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...moved after the advent of the computer. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...are far outweighed its drawbacks in the humans life.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26294820717 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92328759911 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573705179283 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4875158239 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234892342383 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820191625007 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537532778462 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128449666802 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328162800428 0.0609392437508 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

The implication of when computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. Scholars over a decade have agreed to this phenomenon with credible resources. I agree with the statement of how computers can do work more productively by providing goods and services, smarter and make a man happy these will be achieved by creating a pool of empirical evidence to support this topic before attaining a coherent inference.

At the outset, there are diverse approaches why computers are considered as vital but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that computers can do work faster than the manpower. Moreover, computers are running on command, so once command faded it automatically handles the work in big factories and handloom. For instance, food packaging industries machines run via command of computers, so less manpower consumption. Hence accuracy in work has a vital role to play in the above-mentioned topic.

Furthermore, it also has the capacity to providing goods and services faster and smarter rather than human being. As an example, earlier time there were postmen who delivered posts at the stakeholder's home, now email can reach within a moment to the person and dealing can be possible via the medium of computer and internet.

Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that computers can do work faster, smarter and accurate rather than human manpower. It can be predicted that in the near future all work will be handled via computers.