When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is advantageous to learn their cultures and traditions. How do u think people can learn other cultures and traditions? Why do u think that some people are interested in learning those traditions an

The idea of some people thinks foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural-historical attractions in the country is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.

There are a number of argument in front of my stance. One of the most conspicuous aspects of charging more to foreign visitors in comparison to local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country is that it will increasingly float more foreign investments. Not only they will spend more to visit such cultural and historical attractions, but they will spend more on our cultural food and wearings. Needless to say, all these merits as mentioned above with stand subject in good stead, when it comes to foreign visitors investments on once culture.

However, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the charging more from the foreign visitors on their visit to cultural and historical attractions in a country. The primary one lies in the fact that it may decrease the foreign visitors. Besides, that less visitor may lead to low investment of foreign currency in a country. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the charging more from the foreign visitors.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of charging more from the foreigners far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of charging more prove the significance of floating more investment in foreign currency, but also pinpoint its implications.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12544802867 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8432270996 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8215284994 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212959815968 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756408732734 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075997026677 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142532886438 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863267885395 0.0609392437508 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.