Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree Or Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

It has long been a subject of discussion on whether experimental learning can work well in formal education or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad arguments are in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% of people benefit from the above-mentioned notion, whereas 30% of people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above sentence.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% of citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved they're existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly outweigh drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say that experimental learning can work well in formal education.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% of people benef...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit from the above-mentioned notion, whereas 30% of people face disadvantages...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...posed government reforms. They improved theyre existing scenario tremendously and that...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8708447524 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0171140142 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132181291338 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542704631439 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985567564233 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934371922553 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773752420613 0.0609392437508 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.