Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the efficiency of adding technical learning in formal curriculum and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this idea can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons of enhancing the productivity in formal curriculum by adding some extra experiment based courses. These benefits are rooted in the fact of modern education. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, the experimental, technical and practical courses diminish the dull time which is feeling in the formal ones. Due to existing some activities the spirit of boring circumstances will be killed. Pupils are engaged in their tasks and tutors try to instruct them by performing some particular tasks.
On the one hand, there is no doubt studying the theoritical and practical courses in the same curriculum has some opponents. They argue that having these two kind of education system make tutorials distracted. They strongly focus on concentration which is one of the paramount factor in learning lessons. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, pupils should be put in the appropriate conditions. Undoubtedly, they have different tastes, beliefs and attitides and succeed in lessons much depends on these factors.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of learning some technical and philosofical courses in the same time is beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 85
- In a social events, Being a good talker or a good listener which one is better 77
- Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- Should be held legally responsible for the actions of their children. Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position with your own study, experience or observations. 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.559566787 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14003891495 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.750911777 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821139966942 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259450267384 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303933543491 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471665550255 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020489383373 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.