Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of "areas of concern that governments should allocate funds to" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that spending money on education might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that funding climate change can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the environment standpoint, allocating funds by governments to climate change can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that global warming and preserving environment are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the amount of the government budget in preserving the wildlife. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both controlling sea level and melting glaciers distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of allocating funds to education and public health might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the society's awareness. Moreover, fundamental aspects of welfare can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of funds can pertain to the government budget. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of public health problems were correlated positively with the people's contribution, the local authorities would ultimately address spreading education. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of new sights to the university degrees.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of allocating funds to climate change far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-11 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- Students should be required to stay in school until the age of eighteen To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from your own experience 80
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the plans below shows the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ems were correlated positively with the peoples contribution, the local authorities wou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7972027972 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19465634081 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3159923599 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318401483365 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948260193871 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745134824302 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166786355042 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197147270817 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.