World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.
Recently, the role of female leaderships in decreasing violence and conflict has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Cons and Pros of choosing of female leaderships?". Whereas it is a widely held view that male leaderships are better than female leaderships, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the politic standpoint, leadership qualifications are bound up inextricably with academic study, which indicates they lead to both practical skill and experience. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between military objects and war as well as an exponential increase in military conflict. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of gender role is correlated positively with not only creative thinking but also feelings.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, public belief attribute to female role, in that it would come down to power, decision making, and rational mind. A salient example of such attribution is peace movement, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take forthcoming election for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint wrong leadership problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to economic issues, legislation, and even country management. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of choosing female leaderships are outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Do you think student who go to the universities should pay full fee than who do not go to universities 11
- Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree/disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the politic standpoint, leadership ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eative thinking but also feelings. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the pivotal role of government. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 33, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...ages of choosing female leaderships are outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89310344828 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22465236538 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68275862069 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4452921502 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24465849295 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672932050622 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801740983754 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14193297413 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109595278529 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.