A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to

A nation should not require that all students study the same national curriculum. If every student were presented with the same material, it would be assumed that every student learns the same and that every teacher is capable of teaching the same material in the same way. In addition to neglecting the differences of learning and teaching styles, it would stifle creativity and create a generation of drones. Moreover, a standardized curriculum would also adversely affect students who come from lower-income families or families who have little education as they might not have as many resources for learning outside of school.
Students all learn in very different ways. One child may learn how to spell from reading, another may learn from phonics. If the national curriculum is standardized, suspect one aspect is dropped, that may exclude certain students from learning adequately, and it leaves little room for exploratory learning.
Teachers also have different methods of teaching. For example, if the English curriculum in all high schools were standardized, a book that one teacher teaches excellently and therefore inspires students to read more and learn on their own may be eliminated. It also limits how many of the teachers’ unique teaching methods they can bring into the classroom. Although they ought to be capable enough to teach in a certain way, their students will still miss out on what might have been a great learning experience.
Finally, the education system of a country is designed to put all students on a level playing field. If the national curriculum is standardized, the students who have highly educated parents, or more money to buy books outside of school, or more resources for tutors will immediately gain a foothold. Poorer students from uneducated families in the current school system are at a disadvantage, they will fall throught the cracks.
Learning should be enjoyable. Students should be taught not only the curriculum in school, but only the main body of knowledge that is enormous in the world today and that you can learn your whole life. Having a national curriculum implies that there is a set group of things worth learning for every person. Maybe it is true, but for students, it sets up a world where there is a finite amount of knowledge to be acquired for the purpose of regurgitating it on a test. Teaching a standardized curriculum doesn’t encourage inquiries, it doesn’t make students ask questions like “Why” and “How”. School’s real purpose is teaching people how to learn, not just teaching a set group of facts. By teaching how to learn, students can continue doing so, they can extend skills from one area of knowledge to another. This type of learning fosters the creativity that can be used not only in math science or English, but also in art music or creative writing. Teaching a brain to go beyond being a file cabinet is the best way to teach creativity. Creativity is too often assumed to something only for arts. It is creativity that results in innovation, it is innovation that has resulted in the greatest achievements of humanity in sciences and humanities alike.
There are so many reasons not to standardize the national curriculum. The uniqueness of students and teachers is the most obvious, and students from less educated backgrouds will suffer the most. The creativity of a nation as a whole world will fall within a standardized curriculum. National curriculum should not be standardized and education should be as much about knowledge as it is about learnging to learn.