Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others however argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others, however, argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years,there are many kinds of robots and people believed that they have many advantages and significant for human’s future development. However, others believed that they are dangerous and bad effect on society. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
In this contemporary life, there are many technology devices such as mobile phone, computers or tablets and other robots that they help people to do homework or factory. Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of they are important for human’s future development. First, government subsidies for robots are believed to equalize working and increase product regardless of their background. This robots support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall product rate but also to mitigate tired of people, which promotes an comfortable society. Second, robots are important would probably result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that knowledgeable and skilled robot capital are imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once people use robots too much. First, more and more robots can use in many areas would likely correspond with a financial tremendous strain and unemployment on a country. Generating no income from job and working, people could over-reliant on the state budget for living, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as health care systems and transport infrastructure. Second, people using robots too much tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest for working because they reliant on robots, thereby, adding great burdens for government and staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could spent time for study and working better. It, instead, would be a more robot viable option if the resources were focused on supporting important part such as health or less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, that is no doubt that robot is one of the best inventions because they can do anything better than people do. Meanwhile, this is also the reason they become dangerous and negative effect in the future. From my perspective, government need to have a solution and suitable way to use robot avoid relying too much.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-30 Trần Ánh Vy 78 view
2020-11-23 qtr.tif 84 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
In recent years,there are many kinds of robots and peopl...
^
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...itigate tired of people, which promotes an comfortable society. Second, robots are...
^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'spend'.
Suggestion: spend
...ting time that these young people could spent time for study and working better. It, ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34015345269 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75687903189 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562659846547 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0564213245 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.823529412 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234219706532 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792430079254 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477498451274 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154064745111 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344181103656 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.