Directors of large companies receive much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it's necessary, but others holds it is unfair. Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion.
It is often debatable that the wages of directors and other workers have a vast difference. Some believe that it is favourable to get more salary for high-grade employees and others think this is unreasonable. I believe the distribution of salary according to the qualification and position would be better than equal for everyone.
On the one hand, people who argued about the unfairness of salary distribution often think that directors are receiving a huge amount of money than the other employees who did the actual work and job. Many organisations are pressurising the workers to complete the task or reach the target in a short period to fulfil the manager or director's orders. As a result, the labourers spend too much time at work and sometimes more than the duty time then the appreciation and promoted salary go to the directors. Moreover, many directors are providing lead roles or hints to the employees to complete the task. For instance, supervising the employees rather than involving in the programme in terms of time, intelligence, and physical activity.
On the one hand, some people claim that it is necessary to provide extra payment to the directors because that people are the cornerstone of the company. Directors or managers are spending their intellectual ability to remain in the industries which are often higher than the common employee's way of vision. Such people need to be stable or improve their company among others would be a Himalayan task for the directors. For instance, bank managers, institutional regional and branch managers. Apart from that, directors are the PowerPoint or the founders of the company to discover innovative ideas and distinguish the plans from others often leading the organisation to vivid levels. For example, the CEO of reliance group, and lulu international Group. These directors are extremely honoured to receive high salary than their workers.
To sum up, it is controversial about the high wages of directors in major companies. Nevertheless, in my perspective, it would be helpful to the directors to elaborate and extensive thinking to lead their company in the top level.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16045845272 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93381479208 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.531701773 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.941176471 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282853123063 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849359095135 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575762485561 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164931937198 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468417460977 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.