Some people think that governments should spend money for faster public transportation, others think that there are other important priorities (eg cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Corresponding to the rapid rate of urban development, public vehicle speed is also taken into consideration to align with minimizing the time wastage of transportation. Some contend that the country’s government should take a vital role in this speed improvement. However, in my opinion, some other traffic aspects are further crucial, including road systems and traffic congestion, in terms of holistically developing the country as the whole. In this essay, I will delve into both sides and give my point of view.
To begin with, there is a fact that many researchers and investors are eager to find out the most suitable methods of transportation which can meet the high need of mobility among citizens. It encompasses underground or sky subways which are not unfamiliar to some certain developed countries, particularly Vietnam where sky subways are currently finding their prominent position in Vietnamese traffic maps. This trend has fostered the speed improvement in terms of not only individuals’ mobility but also the country’s growth, given by diminishing time wastage of travel.
On the other hand, while specific subways could give a positive hand to the developmental process of the traffic issue, the reason driving its benefits is more noticeable. Subway systems are generally constructed with their specialized roads which are inaccessible to other kinds of transportation, allowing them to move quickly and smoothly. In the overall view of the urban infrastructure, the subway systems accompanied with their limited number of commuters are also a significant attribution in the traffic congestion of other kinds of transportation, driven by more spaces required but less holistic effect on traffic.
In conclusion, while speeding up urban transportation serves as a method to address current traffic problem of time wastage, it is highly necessary that other aspects also play a vital role to tackle holistically, such as street systems and the overall city infrastructure landscape.
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elopmental process of the traffic issue, the reason driving its benefits is more ...
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with their limited number of commuters are also a significant attribution in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49032258065 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1882393146 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8286087463 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.727272727 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124638004472 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509579839378 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313498413423 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752934013138 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437554783954 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.