the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018

Essay topics:

the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

The provided bar chart elucidates the proportion of weekly budget expenditures of certain families in one country in 1968 and 50 years later, including 8 categories from basic needs, transportation to entertainment. Overall, it is clear that while food accounted for the majority percentage in 1968, there was a trend moving to a balance among those surveyed kinds of family expenditure in 2018.
At first glance, while the family budget weekly contributed predominantly to food, which amounted to over one-third of the total 7-day income in 1968, the remaining contribution was divided roughly equally into the other seven sections, around 10 percent for each.
However, moving to 2018, there was a slight balance in family spending weekly. The bar chart witnessed the highest portions of the span from approximately 15 percent to over 20 percent in transport, food, housing, leisure sector, which was at the expense of the other categories, such as fuel and power, clothing, personal goods, experiencing the modest decrease of around 3 percent compared to the survey in 1968.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp 60 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
Essays by user steveminh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...needs, transportation to entertainment. Overall, it is clear that while food acc...
^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...predominantly to food, which amounted to over one-third of the total 7-day income...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, third, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27906976744 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89821936718 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9804628971 43.030603864 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.6 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19716169693 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110368756388 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502746393357 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135346987586 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531066508749 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.