Many people like to eat unhealthy food even though they know it's bad for them. Why is this? What is an effective way to improve people's healthy eating habits?
While there have been various active campaigns of raising awareness in terms of negative impacts of unhealthy foods, the inclination toward those food types doesn’t seem to decline due to their convenience. In this essay, I will delve into the reasons driving this trajectory and suggest several methods which foster individuals to alter their food consuming habits.
To begin with, it is undeniable that an individual’s life has been influenced by the rapid development of technology and the convenience it offers. Due to the act of viewing time as an invaluable treasure in the today’s era of harsh competition, fast food, which is somehow so-called unhealthy food, seems to take its priority on the list of today generations’ daily meals, giving individuals more time to focus on their major businesses by diminishing the amount of time spending on food preparation and cooking. Furthermore, high-tech applications on individual mobile phones have also contributed to the contemporary alternation in their eating habits, giving them an accessibility to order various tasteful options at their fingertips.
Instead of directly changing the eating tendencies of customers, there is a more comprehensive way to achieve higher effectiveness that is concentrating on food choice availability. As the same modality of selling fast food online, companies could steer the consumer tendencies by adding more healthy food, such as vegetables and less sugar content products, into their food option lists or handing those food as a promotion policy. Additionally, There should be more strict regulations from government management on the online social media platforms, including regularly checking and confining those companies producing low-quality foods, leading to more holistic effectiveness of the campaign.
In conclusion, while consuming fast food and unhealthy food is inevitable in today’s rapid development due to their convenience, supported by the technological evolution, the effectiveness of food campaign only achieves holistic genuineness when there is the collaboration of food companies and local governments.
- More and more people are becoming overweight Some people suggest that increasing the price of fattening food is a solution to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people aspire to a balance between work and other parts of their lives but few achieve it What are the problems in trying to achieve this and how can these problems be overcome 89
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...into their food option lists or handing those food as a promotion policy. Additionally, Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73501577287 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23198705594 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4965530357 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 202.0 106.682146367 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 20.7667163134 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157464810029 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689500982545 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351658312917 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097444454604 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151251834612 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.2 13.0946893788 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.03 50.2224549098 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.