The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates the fluctuation in the beverage preference of Australian citizens in different five urban areas in the last 4 weeks, ranging from taking away fresh or instant coffee to drinking at a cafe.
Overall, it is evident that while it was slightly equal in the habit of buying instant coffee, the other two habits witnessed significant disparities while comparing those five cities surveyed over the last 4 weeks.
According to the graph, there was a percentage difference of approximately 2 percent among those five cities regarding the preference of buying instant coffee over the four-weeks course. While the percentages of Hobart and Brisbane were around 53 percent, the other three cities accounted for 50, 48 and 46 percent in Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney respectively.
On the other hand, the graph experienced a significant percentage difference of 10 percent in each kind of beverage habits while comparing these five urban regions. Delving into the trend of opting for a cafe to drink coffee or tea over the last 4 weeks, the number of Australian residents amounted to over 60 percent in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart, while Adelaide achieved only nearly 50 percent. It was evidently similar to the habit of taking fresh coffee when the percentage of Sydney and Melbourne being over 40 percent compared to under 35 percent accounted for in Brisbane and Adelaide.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- Some people think the government should establish free libraries in each town Others believe that it is a waste of money since people can access the Internet to obtain information Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 84
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78628583153 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.8250425616 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 168.285714286 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5714285714 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140554740162 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075395072375 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366641122127 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100018487272 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209566732527 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.