Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others however argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others, however, argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Robots are thought to be a vital part of human life in the future by some; meanwhile, others believe that they are a threat to the community. From my perspective, both sides have their rational arguments based on observation and prediction. However, I am more convinced by the former idea.
It is obvious that the majority of work once implemented by humans is now taken over by machines. We can achieve the desired one-hundred-percent conciseness with little manual work. A cell phone factory, for example, has to rely mostly on robots to assemble miniature internal chips to diminish possible deviation made by humans. Furthermore, automated machines help enhance productivity because they work continually regardless of external factors such as weather, pandemic, health, time, etc. Whereas, robots can work constantly for days, which leads to more effective manufacture. In conventional companies, workers take turns to work in shifts because their average working capability lasts only eight hours.
Robots can pose a threat to human beings as many employees may lose their jobs if they cannot do irreplaceable tasks. The more people go unemployed, the worse the economy can be; because without income, people cannot afford to consume products made by automated machines. Moreover, if robots offer assistance in every part of humans’ life, people will possibly become more sluggish and passive. For instance, many teenagers nowadays can hardly sweep the floor because they have mobile vacuum robots ready in their house. Another consequence can be obesity since people are going to work less and eat more processed foods. Nevertheless, the negative outcomes can be eliminated by limiting robots’ attendance in our life.
In conclusion, every coin has its both sides, so instead of worrying about robots’ dangers and negative impacts on our future

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-11-23 qtr.tif 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ur life. In conclusion, every coin has its both sides, so instead of worrying abou...
^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngers and negative impacts on our future
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3801369863 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85174052129 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66095890411 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9168392766 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180060220078 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589079440538 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558259743041 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128911357442 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561607634289 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.