Topic: Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations.
There are individuals who contend that delving into the history of one’s family is essential. However, others concur with the lotion of giving the present and future generations precedence. This essay will shed light on both viewpoints before making the final decision.
One major ground behind the reason why some people support to do research in one’s family history is that there would be a better method to discover in-depth knowledge about the heritage and cultural foundation of each member, helping them understand more cultural beauty. In fact, if people do not get a better knowledge of their family history, they are likely not to recognize their role as well as their responsibility to protect and preserve their family cultural values. Furthermore, in the long term, cultural heritage will be imparted to each generation, triggering victorious pride for them. In contrast, doing research in family history might lead to unveiling worse experiences, even negative sides of one person in the past, indirectly having a detrimental effect on mental well-being to several people.
On the flip side, there are potential benefits when researching in family history, which should be taken into consideration. Regarding the former, it can help us address pressing issues (vấn đề cấp bách) and improve the lives of individuals in here and now. Indeed, there is a specific difference between each generation. Therefore, if people only concentrate on exploring the past, they might ignore various issues at present that raise an alarming rate to tackle properly. In addition, present inventions will play a significant role in the next generation in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, evaluating the future demands would be a key element for humans to accelerate sustainable development as well as protect natural resources to ensure a greener planet for future generations.
In conclusion, although it is understandable why some advocate exploring family history, I contend that focusing on present and upcoming generations would be more fruitful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 89
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Topic The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 89
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 320 350
No. of Characters: 1692 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.288 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.817 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.478 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.532 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5