In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products, such as medicines and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?
With the exponential growth of technology, humans nowadays can live up to their expectations. Every aspect of life, food, and other goods met the demand, thereby there are certain arguments that products from animals do not come in useful anymore. From my perspective, I agree with this idea and will shed light on the issue in this essay.
On the one hand, it is apparent that fauna and flora play an important role in the ecosystem, and are directly connected to our lives. They provided a huge amount of food and other materials for us throughout civilization, saving us from starvation, and curing lots of infectious diseases. All these benefits that we cannot deny, and should show our gratitude to them. However, with the prospection of modernization, artificial intelligence, and modern machines have gradually substituted groceries made from wild animals, step by step meeting the needs of inhabitants. To give an example, these days, scientists have successively manufactured a variety of robots, using AI intelligence. This genre of the robot is a magical tool supporting doctors in complicated operations or drug production, which require competency skills. Therefore, this approach will help us to save time, and effort to discover new products.
On the other hand, saving wild animals involved their significant roles in directly influencing our lives. It is obvious that everything in nature is connected, as a result, if one of the species dies out, a huge majority of other animals will be affected when the food chain is interrupted. Therefore, today the community pays much attention to preserving the natural environment, due to the fact that more and more species are driven to the verge of mass extinction. In terms of protecting them from disappearance, people are trying their best to consume eco-friendly merchandise instead of animal products. For instance, during fashion week in Milan, Italy, a myriad of well-known designers introduced a collection of recycled clothes with vivid creativity rather than fur costume as usual. By that I mean, today human beings are entirely capable of creating necessities with the aid of automatic machines, particularly active workers. As a result, animals do not have to suffer for our needs anymore.
In conclusion, I believe that our desires do not justify the suffering of animals, and animal products are no longer necessary as well. We can choose a different source of nourishment, medicine, and clothing without any toll on wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | mingchou265 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-09 | hakinguyen | 84 | view |
- Topic Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations 56
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24317617866 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99198583924 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8397993588 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187853631388 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498766693977 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674250021779 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120804635131 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532121653792 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.