The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The three pie charts below give the comparison of annual spending in UK school during the period from 1981 to 2001. It is clearly seen from the given pie chart is that the highest percentage was for teacher’s salaries and the lowest percentage was for insurance in 1981, 1991 and 2001
According to the given percent shows in the pie chart in 1981, teacher’s salaries accounted for 40%, which ranked in the first portion whereas the second place was for other worker’s salaries , at 28%. Being the last place of the total school spending in 1981, the insurance was for 2%. Especially, both resources and furniture and equipment were equal, at 15%.
Meanwhile, teacher’s salaries constituted 50% in 1991 and accounted for 45% in 2001. One fifth of furniture and equipment in 2001, which was the highest number among three pie charts. The minority of resources in 2001 dropped into the lowest percentage, as opposed to it was in 1991, at 20%. Standing at the second position among three pie charts, Insurance represented 3% respectively. In the other hand, 28% of other worker’s salaries fell into the highest percentage, which was 6% higher than it was in 1991 and 13% higher than it was in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | wardiati | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was for insurance in 1981, 1991 and 2001 According to the given percent shows in ...
^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ace was for other worker's salaries , at 28%. Being the last place of the tot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94174757282 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80134926466 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47572815534 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.5058556705 43.030603864 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205052452292 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107122995898 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114632637332 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169622939313 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927521392618 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.