the table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011
The table compares the number of people who cycled to work in twelve areas of the UK over the period of 10 years. Overall, it is clear that there was an increase in the number of resident s travellingto work by bicycle from 2001 to 2011 in the UK.
In both years, Inner London had the highest number of residents cycling, at over 43 thousand people in 2001 and 106 thousand people in 2011 and an increase 144%. The second biggest increase in the number of commuters cycling to work was in Brighton and Hove, at 109%. However, only 3168 people and 6635 people using bicycle to travel to work in 2001 and 2011 respectively.
The second highest number of commuters cycling to work was in Outer London but the increase was the lowest, at 455. Compared to Outer London, Liverpool had the percentage change at 48% but the number of residents cycling to work was dramatically lower than Outer London.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-24 | levanhoan123 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | kindlebalada | 100 | view |
| 2021-02-13 | Isha Mehra | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the types of music album purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart shows the average life expectancy for males and females in 1900 1950 and 1990 75
- The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone 92
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school 73
- Levels of young crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table compares the number of people who cycled to work in twelve area...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y bicycle from 2001 to 2011 in the UK. In both years, Inner London had the high...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to work in 2001 and 2011 respectively. The second highest number of commuters c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6149068323 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39563212478 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484472049689 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.533078493 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324462675384 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170825606198 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679154013535 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249236843394 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101572697965 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.