“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
The lust for command and leadership in mankind has always brought massacre and deadths of commoners. Some people believe that manipulating a groups ideology leads to suffering of a common man, while others maintain opposite of this statement. This essay will discuss that how groups of various ideologies based on racism, culture and religion can be exploited and result in deadths of a common man and suffering of his family.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of group ideologies leading to deadths of common man. To begin with, leaders with cruel intention create tensions among mobs of different ideologies to gain their personal interests. This leads to a massacare and clash between groups of different ideologies and finally entails in deaths of common man and suffering of his loved ones. As an example, Indo-Pak separation on basis of different religious ideologies led to deadths of numerous common Hindus and Muslims. Hence, undoubtedly millions of common lives are lost due to ideological clashes.
In the same context, various non-state actors in contradiction with different ideologies, fund numerous organizations to disturb the peace of the world. For instance, funding of various terrorist organizations eventually result in deadths of common man and bear suffering for his / her family. Furthermore, the example of 9/11 further reinforces the statement. Therefore, it is quite evident that countires or organizations in pursuit of their personal interests do not care for the value of a common man’s life.
In conclusion, various leaders, non-state actors and organizations fund and exploit the ideological basis to create tensions between groups and mobs which finally effect and result in loss of a common man’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- As a result of advances in medical care, life expectancy is increasing for both men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? what are the disadvantages of the ageing population for individuals and the society? Support y 77
- Nowadays fewer people tend to look after their old relatives and send them to some old age homes What is the situation in your country In your opinion who should be responsible to look after the elderly 76
- Leaders should let people take part in decision making. Do you agree or disagree 60
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Government should spend money constructing new houses rather than preserve historic buildings. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...Some people believe that manipulating a groups ideology leads to suffering of a common...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44727272727 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91846420439 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4530655171 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230650913942 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846335660262 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510540298355 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145729477698 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143220952657 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.