work
In a world of perpetual changes and advancements, there is a sharp rise on the choices of working options, to which different people prefer different types. From my point of view, I would like to work only three days for long hours rather than five days a week for shorter hours.
The most conspicuous reason is that with longer hours each day, it is easier for individuals to catch on the projects assigned. Since you don’t need to worry that it is time to go home as soon as you start to deal with a thing energetically. Likewise, you would dedicate enough time to rise to the occasion, which can give you a sense of achievement. Under such circumstance, not only are companies bound to afford employers the sense of belonging, but also employers would do their jobs as a labor. Myself could fully illustrate this point. I worked for a newspaper as an editor two years ago. To begin with, I worked during regular time from Monday to Friday for only 2 hours a day. To my worry, shouldering the responsibility for writing the most significant part of the newspaper, I couldn’t finish each day’s assignment on time. What’s worse, the next day I needed to recall what I have thought yesterday and spend longer time continuing to write the remaining essay. Nevertheless, in order to get rid of the excessive stress on myself, I chose to work three hours a day and worked for three days each week. Far from leaving the assignment to be finished the next day, I could was engaged in writing passages and got into the swing of taking advantage of the whole part of time. As a result, this change become a gateway to finish jobs each day and thus I could be relaxed and enjoyable after work every day.
Furthermore, having two more days off, you can plan to do many things you like during these days. Relaxation is an essential ingredient of one’s life. On the basis of this, you could dedicate a wealth of time visiting many places of interests without worrying about returning to work, which, to some extent, could also expand your outlook. By the same token, you could also cultivating other interests and immerse yourself in them during the break such as doing sports, reading books and surfing on the Internet.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Not only can you be mindful of your work, but also you can switch it off totally.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Elephant 88
- work 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cultivate'
Suggestion: cultivate
...look. By the same token, you could also cultivating other interests and immerse yourself in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58093126386 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59410426642 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505543237251 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2717864203 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.55 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235100019523 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088979269483 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104283121314 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180496847406 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681246658056 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.