The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The data given in the line graph depict the utilization of different six kinds of fuel in America over a period of 50 years, these figures are measured in quadrillion units.
As can be seen that, it is a clear evident that hydropower is the only source predicted to see an down ward trend; while the others are estimated to grow despite fluctuation over the given period. Petrol and oil has the highest number during the period.
In 1980, petrol and oil stood at 35 quadrillion units, and it reached to 40 after a significant oscillation in 2005; afterward, it is expected to peak at a half by the year 2030. There were dramatic vacillations in coal and natural gas between 1980 and 2015. However, while coal is estimated to surge sharply to just over 30 by 2030, natural gas is anticipated to remain stable from 2015 to 2030.
Nuclear, solar and wind in hydropower started at approximately 4 quadrillion units in 1980. Nevertheless, nuclear and solar and wind experienced moderate growth to 8 and 5 respectively in 2005. After that, they are expected to levelling out before going up slightly by 2030, at 9 and 6 separately. Hydropower was stood at the lowest point and it is also predicted to have the smallest figure in spite of slight oscillation, at around 3 quadrillion units by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water use for different purposes in six areas of the world. 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 56
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 78
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...wer is the only source predicted to see an down ward trend; while the others are e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73568281938 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81897023406 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603524229075 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6438385765 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0808064044879 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318676537498 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268750824745 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429763100211 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365787045012 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.