The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The data given in two bar charts depict what UK graduate and postgraduate students did after leaving university in the year 2008.
Overall, the number of graduates in the first chart was far higher than that of postgraduates in the second one. Further study was the most common choice taken by both of them while a few students volunteer for charity work.
On the first graph, there were 17735 graduates spending their time on temporary job. Similarly, students who were not in the work force were 16235. The number of students seeking for further study was double the quantity of unemployed students, at 29665. Voluntary work was the least popular choice, only 3500 students chose this destination.
On the second graph, further study also had the highest number, at 2725. In the second place was part-time work which was slightly lower than further study’s number, at 2535. The figure for unemployment was 1625 that was more five-fold the number of voluntary work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The chart shows ways that schoolchildren go to school in three different countries 83
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The plans below show a school library five years ago and the same library now 67
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, similarly, so, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06790123457 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48320835436 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.3981957924 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219712438011 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934201350684 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109197462444 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171198103211 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139472290296 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.