The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
In the 1970’s, a group of people raised the question of whether non-human animals should have rights or not. Some people say they should because they have feelings like us and this fact should be taken into account. Other people believe that animals are inferior to humans, and therefore do not share the same rights. In the context of this debate, a dispute concerning the existence of zoos and how animals are treated in them has also arisen. Some people are asking if zoos are helping or hurting animals. Some people are even asking if zoos should be banned. In my opinion, zoos sometimes help animals, but sometimes they also hurt them.
I think zoos hurt animals because animals should live and flourish in their natural environments, where they can develop their natural abilities. Otherwise, they will live frustrated for not being able to relieve themselves from the natural energy they are born with. And that is the same as hurting them.
On the other hand, animals are sometimes sick or have lost their parents and need to be taken care of, or else they could easily die. Thus, specialized people who work at zoos and take care of them, in these cases are not hurting them, rather they are helping them.
In conclusion, I believe that the question is not if we should ban or not ban zoos. I think an accurate study should be conducted concerning how many animals are being hurt in zoos and how many animals are being helped. In this manner, people would have a more precise way of seeing things and would have more elements to be able to decide what is best for the animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | ratnumohit | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | rohit1234 | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | msgnaneswaran | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | bashob | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...e 1970's, a group of people raised the question of whether non-human animals should have rights or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67375886525 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25473920908 2.71678728327 83% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492907801418 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7280628294 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361965741115 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130961159065 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067558554147 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22198850681 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716231253326 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 12.6369458128 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.5310837438 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.32886699507 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.