Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether taking lessons with academics to be more beneficial in comparison with learning through television or the internet is a moot question. However, education in learning environment seems to have always an overwhelming superiority over learning from other sources despite the many benefits of which. This essay will explain why.
Firstly, students usually place a premium on studying under the supervision of pedagogical experts. If they prefer to take teacher-led lessons, it is because teachers often are well-educated not only in teaching procedures but in a particular field of study as well. This will give students the ideal opportunity to take in all lessons from the right sources. Therefore, they can greatly benefit from the interaction with their pedagogue and their peers in an academic environment meaning that they will be able to question whenever having a problem with the lessons or whatever vague. Likewise, the continuous assessment provided by teachers which in turn help them make steady progress in the learning process. Further and even more importantly, though, students will be able to select courses based on their interest fields. This can be seen, for example, at universities where a bewildering array of options ranging from theoretical courses to practical ones as well as various well-rounded professors are available.
It is true that the importance of other sources such as television and the internet should not be ignored as they can be instantly accessible everywhere. Nevertheless, their functionality pales compared to the human-teaching method by which students could master far more.
Overall, to discriminate between learning sources, although television and the internet could play a complementary role in learning, it would appear that guided learning is easily the most functional and efficient procedure, by a significant margin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 69 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping? Explain your reasons 85
- Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Television has improved the quality of life for the the ordinary person Do you agree or diagree 91
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like Some people think this is a complete waste of time To what extent do you agree ot disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1022, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well-rounded professors are available. It is true that the importance of other ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56597222222 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0470347576 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.018593701 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328338111135 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100724265606 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596202180394 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186966504894 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382699375319 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.