Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity. Do government have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Nowadays, cigarette is consuming a lot and resulting mortality rate increasing in this world. Reasons either chronic diseases which engulfed in our societies or awareness related to these causes. Some people believe that governments have regulation to control it's consumption and protect citizens whereas other people argue that it mainly should be controlled by individuals. In this essay, I shall discuss both views and explore the logical conclusion.
To start with, every single citizen possesses right of consumption of cigarettes but in boundaries of prescribed drugs. There are multifarious reasons why governments come forward to save citizens. One of them is economic and healthy factor of country itself. For instance if citizens are not healthy and engulf with many diseases then how nation can grow. In addition, governments want their citizens in top list in any competitions. By banning cigarettes government can grow.
On contrary, people argue that protecting citizens from smoking is only responsibility of individual are correct on their notion. They believe that individual understands about their financial position and nurture their family. People argue that growth of individual is growth of nation. This will cure and decrease the mortality rate. Cigarettes are most lethal drugs which show bad effects only.
In conclusion, this essay discussed both views for this argument. In my personal opinion, Both are responsible to ban this venomous drug. Governments and individuals are responsible to accept the bad influences of smoking which is manufactured with lethal drugs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Nowadays many people take drugs What is an impact of drugs on society today 89
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city. Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 77
- Talk about pros/cons of this era as it is full of daily inventions? 77
- Environment has become a major concern over the last of couple of decades. resulting in several debtaes on who should be responsible for ensuring its sustenance for our future generations. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws and explore the logical conclusion. To start with, every single citizen poss...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anning cigarettes government can grow. On contrary, people argue that protectin...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hal drugs which show bad effects only. In conclusion, this essay discussed both...
^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...sed both views for this argument. In my personal opinion, Both are responsible to ban this venom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58024691358 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8974232912 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633744855967 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.191782785 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 20.9669160288 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0590835343642 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0183786805408 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191670852288 0.071462118173 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367453506249 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118412911012 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.49 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.