Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity. Do government have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs all over the world. There are a wide range of factor that account for why this is happening. In my opinion, this problem can be remedied provided that some effective measures are taken.
There are a myriad of reasons accountable for this soaring concern. Unlike everyday problems, which can be dealt with easily, tobacco is mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs, which is extremely perilous can lead to an array of such issues as lung disease and cancer. Thanks to the aforementioned predicaments, it is not only people but also society which can suffer immensely.
Steps to deal with problem are many, but the most effective ones are in fact not remote or complicated but accessible and practicable. The primary one stems from the fact that by ensuring the implementation of set rules and polices, government authorities can help a nation thrive. Besides, international organisations and local authorities should take the necessary initiatives cumulatively. Only when convergent efforts from all aspects are ensured, can we expect to see some considerable progress in curbing the issue.
To conclude, dealing with tobacco is mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs is one of the most prevalent problems that faces almost all parts of the world today. Nevertheless, the concrete steps as discussed above can effectively strength the fight against and alleviate this growing concern, its potential impact is indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Do you think cash-less society is realistic? What are the merits and demerits? 77
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and lesspeople use cash. How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits or problems? 65
- Whether studying films at school is as important as literature? 77
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health 77
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well? 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ective measures are taken. There are a myriad of reasons accountable for this soaring...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, nevertheless, so, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04363636364 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88188184616 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.716583989 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.583333333 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207984002823 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745469866984 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968361699883 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141304583991 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783598234754 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.