The maps below show an island, before and after the constructions of some tourist facilities.
The given pictorial representations compare a small island, before & after the development carried out for tourism purposes. Exactly, 100 meters area is developed which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, there are number of constructions have been done to facilitate the tourists and all are done without deforestation which includes swimming, reception, pier and restaurant.
To begin with, in the west direction of the island a swimming pool is created beside the beach. Also near the beach, number of accommodations have been built for the comfort level of tourists. Moving furthur, a restaurant is constructed behind the reception in the north direction. In addition to this footpaths and vehicle tracks were built so that people can easily move from one place to another. Most importantly, every development is done without providing any harm to natural resources.
Overall, It is evident that, accommodation and other facilities for tourists were built and a pire was constructed to permit access to the island by boat.
- The maps below show an island, before and after the constructions of some tourist facilities. 78
- The flowchart illustrates the production of colour plastic paper clips in a small factory. 56
- Technological advancements have decreased the writing and mathematical skills of the students nowadays.Should the use of calculator and computer be limted in the classrooms or not? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...mming pool is created beside the beach. Also near the beach, number of accommodation...
^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... in the north direction. In addition to this footpaths and vehicle tracks were built...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38554216867 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04632148359 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680722891566 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3838176121 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134463469416 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488830495425 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515663865442 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838237973644 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320708399902 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.