Facing penalties for not on time children
Recently, the phenomenon of penalties for late assignments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of facing fixed penalties is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that introducing a heavy penalty can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, imposing a minimum penalty on overdue assignments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of introducing a fixed penalty on not on time assignments and developing the literacy rate are inextricably bound up. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between to be exactly on time and imposing minimum penalties as well as an exponential increase in the academic success. Thus, beneficial ramifications of imposing a minimum penalty for belated assignments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, facing severe penalties on belated assignments for children might augment the consequences of educational backwardness. Moreover, fundamental aspects of introducing penalties for children could relate to this reality that the demerits of scientific retardation pertain to imposing severe penalties. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of heavy penalty is correlated negatively with mental retardation in children. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of meliorating chronically late kids.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imposing appropriate punishment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of imposing minimum penalty prove the significance of being on time, but also pinpoint diligence and indolence management implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77666666667 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32226662921 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.07472967 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.416666667 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3742063374 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124419520793 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823291424754 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199237293616 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812007022554 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.