As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Every year technology surpasses every milestone it set the previous year and as a result last year’s technology drops in price and therefore becomes more accessible to the public. While advancements in technology are generally regarded as a positive matter, it is likely that their reliability for problem solving will diminish humans’ ability to think critically.
Aside from millenials, most people can recall being pressured into mastering basic arithmetic in maths class as ‘they would seldom have access to a calculator outside of school’. However, today everyone walks around with a compact device that can easily provide an answer for any question its’ user could think of, let alone calculate some elementary school maths problem. As the popularity of these devices flourished, so did the opportunities for application developers who could profit of something as mundane as reminding people to drink water throughout the day or stand up from their desks intermittently.
While more complicated applications of the latest technology, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, require the most talented scientists and engineers, the finished product is often intended to be noncomplex, intuitive and elequontly implemented into the user’s life. Bringing technology of such magnitude straight to the user will undoubtedly cause them to rely on it too much without considering the negative long-term effects.
As impressive and revolutionary as today’s technology is, its ease of use and widespread applications are undeniably robbing humans of their ability to think for themselves. Rather than wasting time thinking, it is much more convenient to look up the solution to a problem or to use a tool that someone has created for that exact purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 63
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, while, as to, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6336996337 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15322708376 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0029238641 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.888888889 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246022362541 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950221952576 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634987148698 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145289506273 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679368644497 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 48.8420337079 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 12.1743820225 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.38706741573 129% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.