Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Learning starts at a young age and is a vital part of life. There are many different techniques which can be used for learning and impact people differently. Whereas others may choose to reflect from experience and mistakes, the most common education in which an educator explains concepts which have been prioritized for young minds. The most effective way to teach a new subject is explaining its background and purpose, which is why educators should teach facts after having their students study the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Breaking a new subject into small and simple concepts greatly effects the learning threshold for most students. It also has the effect of encouraging thinking independently and curiosity on the subject. A common example of this is showing a short film in a physics class, for example using animals to visualize concepts like velocity or acceleration, which both entertain and provide valuable insight into the subject.
Even though an educator’s main purpose is teaching, it is not impossible to do so while also being entertaining. They should remember how they first approached the subject and how they got so interested in it that they decided to teach it later in life. This passion can be shared with a classroom by providing anecdotes or trends this subject impacted, before cementing the facts in the students’ minds.
However, this can prove difficult when the subject in discussion is highly theoretical or obscure, leading to other teaching techniques which may prove more less student friendly. Thankfully, these types of subjects tend to have their students lose interest for this reason and are therefore rather rare. In any case, it is hard to argue that fully understanding the underlying ideas and concepts is tremendously helpful when approaching a new subject.
Teaching a new subject can be challenging but should be manageable with the right techniques. By first explaining the ideas and concepts surrounding the subject an educator can both make their life easier by easing the students’ learning threshold and make the learning experience more entertaining for the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | bhavya_vasudeva | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 63
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 62
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 75
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... and is a vital part of life. There are many different techniques which can be used for learni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...her teaching techniques which may prove more less student friendly. Thankfully, these typ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 347.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31412103746 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89597400689 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550432276657 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4756927199 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.933333333 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.70786347227 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287630739245 0.218282227539 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935097046766 0.0743258471296 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15604238922 0.0701772020484 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156633701157 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132162317738 0.0628817314937 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.