The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities
Nowadays, people highly try to meet their needs, so they always make a lot of attempts to earn money. A controversial question in this regard is that should a person who has more money more give away to charities? In my opinion, I think that people who have more money should use the money for the other purposes to get more advantages. I elaborate my reasons hereunder.
The first reason comes to my mind is that people with more money should invest in some projects to improve the quality of people’s lives, so not only do all people take enormous benefits, but also poor people can use the advantages of these improvements. Investing money in the various realms such as agriculture, and industrial causes many developments in their countries, and therefore this investing provides high-quality welfare for people living in the poverty. On the other hand, donating to charities only can meet primitive needs such as food, clothing, but by investing, poor people can get benefits all aspects of developed countries such as various job positions, high-tech technology, and so forth.
The second reason is that living in the contemporary world requires the wide range of necessaries to live with more wellbeing. Generally, many things which people need are greatly expensive such as a place for accommodation and a sufficient car, so people try to have more money and accumulate a hoard of money to purchase their needs. However, if they donate their little money, eventually, they will engage in poverty. Also, the value of their donations is very low price and cannot help the charities to solve the considerable problems of poverty. The economic standpoint shows that ordinary people who always suffer many economic problems should accumulate their cash for themselves.
All in all, in my opinion, donating more by people have more money is not practical because not only people cannot afford their normal life should save money, but also people have more money should invest in various economic plans to flourish their countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | mrhj75 | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | reeya kiran | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 76
- Advertising can tell you a lot about a country 73
- If you had a presentation in a month, would you rather prepare for it from now or would you postpone it to the last days. 81
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily. 60
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, i think, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7057729263 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6481435885 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27583698015 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121810459793 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151157200286 0.0737576698707 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218607895421 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126025377319 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.