After the First Industrial Revolution, the society developed rapidly. Not only the economy becomes prosperous, people’s spiritual quality also increases a lot. People begin to think more about social obligations and action rules, which people need to follow. However, different people have different own opinion about these social demands. Now, there is a controversy. Some people believe that the richer people are, the more they need to donate while others disagrees with this opinion. According to me, I advocate that the more money a person has, the more should he or she to donate.
First of all, doing charity has advantages for rich people themselves. Raising money for charity can improve the rich people’s social influence. Donating money is a kind of charitable deeds, which has significant influence. Many medias will report this activity, so more people may pay attention to this charitable rich person. Under this situation, not only the charitable people will be known as kind-hearted, the company which he or she behalves will also be reported as compassionate one. positive propagandas of the company will let people believe this company’s credit and the product’s quality. By this reason, more customers will be willing to buy something in this company which has a charitable leader. As a result, the company will make more profits, and the rich people will also gain in this process.
Second, giving away more to the charity will also be good for the society. It is useful to sustain social stability. Nowadays, some poor people feel unsatisfied about their living condition and even do something illegal, such as robbery, to make money. This kind of action will disturb the stability of society, and people may feel worried about their safety. If rich people can donate money to help poor people to change living quality, the poor will have enough money to invest some small business and sustain their families. Under the stable living condition, some poor people will not disturb the social stability. Moreover, more donation from the rich people will allow the government to develop other aspects. The government uses considerable outlay to help a large amount of poor people every year. Because of this situation, the government cannot place emphasis on other aspects. By contrast, if the rich people can donate more money, the government may use the revenue to develop other aspects, such as the medical well-being and the public transportation.
Admittedly, some oppositions about this opinion are reasonable in some cases. Donation is a kind of voluntary action, and the rich people have the right to decide how to use their personal property. Thus, they do not have the obligation to give money away to charity. Furthermore, the rich people can use their money to do other things, which are more meaningful. They can provide houses with low price for the poor. They can explore new energy that not only make profits but also is critical for sustainable development.
Although there are some reasons that can support the opposition, it is still more reasonable that rich people should donate more to the charity. After all, donating has advantages for rich people themselves and the society.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money a person has the more he or she should give away to the charities 73
- A university should focus more on its facilities such as libraries computers or laboratory rather than on hiring famous teachers 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money a person has the more he or she should give away to the charities 73
- For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 489, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ile others disagrees with this opinion. According to me, I advocate that the more money a perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Positive
... also be reported as compassionate one. positive propagandas of the company will let peo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, while, after all, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 9.8082437276 275% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16571428571 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60087827482 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445714285714 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0692014491 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1818181818 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0303030303 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200970706297 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640306807276 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814497694617 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135694608144 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406302416482 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.